Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a writ petition challenging a statutory assessment order was maintainable when the petitioner had not filed the statutory appeal within the maximum period of limitation, and whether the petitioner could still seek rectification under the rectification provision.
Analysis: The assessment order was appealable under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 within the prescribed period, with only a limited further period available for condonation of delay. The writ petition was filed beyond the maximum permissible appellate period. In view of the settled principle governing writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Court declined to entertain a challenge to an order that had not been pursued through the statutory appellate remedy within limitation. The Court also kept open the petitioner's right, if otherwise available in law, to seek rectification of the impugned order under the rectification provision, without expressing any view on the merits of such claim.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable against the unappealed assessment order filed beyond the maximum limitation period, and the challenge was rejected. The petitioner was left at liberty, if otherwise entitled, to pursue rectification in accordance with law.