Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a concluded order under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 could be quashed merely because civil proceedings concerning the same property were pending.
Analysis: Proceedings under Section 145 are intended to prevent breach of peace by deciding the factum of possession on a given date and do not confer title. The pendency of a civil suit concerning the same property does not, by itself, justify setting aside a final and competent order passed under Section 145. The earlier decision relied upon for quashing such proceedings applies where parallel criminal proceedings are sought to be continued despite a pending civil dispute, not where a concluded Magistrate's order already exists. The aggrieved party must seek relief before the civil court, which is competent to determine the issue of possession independently.
Conclusion: The High Court was not justified in quashing the proceedings under Section 145 merely because civil proceedings were pending; the Magistrate's order could not be nullified on that ground.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the High Court's order was set aside, and the Magistrate's order was restored, leaving the parties to work out their rights in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A final order under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, determining possession, cannot be set aside solely because civil litigation regarding the same property is pending, since Section 145 concerns only temporary possession and remains subject to the civil court's determination.