Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a demerger amounting to a mere reorganisation of business and involving no sale or consideration, the respondent was entitled to charge unearned increase under the perpetual lease deed and the applicable policy.
Analysis: The lease clause enabling recovery of unearned increase was directed to cases of sale, transfer, assignment or parting with possession so that the lessor could recover a portion of the profit earned by the lessee. On the facts, the transaction was a demerger within the same business group, with common management and no consideration passing. The policy provision dealing with a newly floated company did not cover such a demerger, and the clause dealing with conversion of a partnership into a company reflected the policy's approach to mere reorganisation. The cited precedent on amalgamation was distinguished because it involved different facts and a different basis for transfer.
Conclusion: The demand for unearned increase was not sustainable, and the appellants were entitled to relief against the impugned demand and notice.
Ratio Decidendi: A demerger that is only a reorganisation of business, without sale, consideration, or an element of profit-making transfer, does not attract a demand for unearned increase under a lease clause aimed at transfer transactions.