Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether attachments effected after creation of an equitable mortgage could survive the sale of the mortgaged property in recovery proceedings and continue to burden the purchaser's title.
Analysis: The recovery sale was conducted under the statutory recovery mechanism made applicable through Section 29 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, read with the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962. The mortgage in favour of the bank predated the later attachments. The legal effect of a mortgage as an encumbrance was held to prevail over subsequent attachments, and the principle was applied that attachments do not create title or override the rights arising from an earlier mortgage. Once the sale was confirmed, the later attachments could not continue to affect the purchaser's title and were liable to be removed from the records.
Conclusion: The subsequent attachments did not affect the purchaser's title, and the sale was held to be free of those encumbrances.