Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, having paid the third instalment beyond the prescribed period under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997, was entitled to refund or adjustment of that instalment and consequential relief.
Analysis: The payment under the scheme was required to be made within ninety days from the date of application. The third instalment was admittedly paid after the due date. In view of the governing legal position already settled by the Supreme Court, belated payment did not satisfy the scheme requirement, but the payer remained entitled to seek refund or adjustment of the amount paid beyond time. The proper course was for the petitioner to apply to the competent Commissioner of Income-tax, who would then act in accordance with the law declared by the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to seek refund or adjustment of the delayed third instalment, and the competent authority was directed to decide such application in accordance with law.