Invalid Reassessment under Income-tax Act; Disallowance Upheld; Scientific Research Expenditure Allowed

The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act were found invalid as the assessee had disclosed all material facts during the original assessments, and the conditions for reopening after four years were not met. Disallowance under Section 14A for computing book profit under Section 115JB was upheld based on a High Court decision. The Tribunal allowed the alternative claim under Section 35(1)(iv) for scientific research expenditure. The issue of credit under Section 115JAA was remitted back for consideration. The appeals for A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07 were partly allowed, while the Revenue's cross appeals were dismissed. The assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2009-10 was allowed pro-tanto.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act.
2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Act while computing book profit under Section 115JB.
3. Disallowance of expenditure under Section 37 of the Act and alternative claim under Section 35(1)(iv).
4. Credit under Section 115JAA of the Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147:
The assessee challenged the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, arguing that the original assessments were completed under Section 143(3) and all details were duly considered. The notices under Section 148 were issued after four years, invoking the proviso to Section 147, which requires a failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. The assessee contended there was no such failure, and the reopening was based on a change of opinion. The Tribunal found that the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the AO had considered the relevant Tribunal orders from earlier years. Therefore, the conditions for invoking Section 147 after four years were not met, and the reassessment proceedings were invalid. Grounds 2 and 3 of the assessee were allowed.

2. Disallowance under Section 14A while Computing Book Profit under Section 115JB:
The assessee argued that disallowance under Section 14A could not be made while computing book profit under Section 115JB. The Tribunal noted that various benches had held that such disallowances should not be added back to book profit. However, the Delhi High Court in CIT v. Goetze (India) Ltd held that expenditure relatable to any income to which Section 10 applies should be added back for MAT computation. Based on this, the Tribunal overruled the decisions of coordinate benches and dismissed Ground 4 of the assessee.

3. Disallowance of Expenditure under Section 37 and Alternative Claim under Section 35(1)(iv):
The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision for A.Y. 2009-10, where it affirmed the disallowance under Section 37 but allowed the alternative claim under Section 35(1)(iv) for scientific research. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the AO for verification and quantification of the eligible expenditure under Section 35(1)(iv). Accordingly, Ground 5 of the assessee was dismissed, and Ground 6 was allowed for statistical purposes.

4. Credit under Section 115JAA:
The assessee's ground regarding the credit available under Section 115JAA was not adjudicated by the CIT(A). The Tribunal remitted this issue back to the AO for consideration, allowing Ground 5 of the assessee for statistical purposes.

Summary of Result:
1. Appeals of the assessee for A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07 are partly allowed.
2. Cross appeals by the Revenue for A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07 are dismissed.
3. Appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2009-10 is allowed pro-tanto.

Order Pronounced:
The order was pronounced in the open court on 31st May 2016.

---