Wakf-alal-aulad validity depends on a permanent charitable ultimate purpose; a separate gift to poor relatives survived.

A wakf-alal-aulad is protected under the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913 only where family maintenance is linked to an ultimate religious, pious, or charitable purpose of a permanent character. On the facts described, the deed failed that test because its ultimate destinations were not clearly charitable or permanent and the settlor retained the income for absolute use, so the wakf was invalid and void except to the limited extent saved. A separate direction to pay a yearly sum to poor relatives was treated as a distinct charitable trust, and that provision survived notwithstanding the invalidity of the main wakf.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the deed of wakf constituted a valid wakf-alal-aulad within the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913; (ii) whether the provision setting apart a yearly sum for the poor relatives was a valid charitable trust notwithstanding the invalidity of the wakf.

Issue (i): whether the deed of wakf constituted a valid wakf-alal-aulad within the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913

Analysis: The statutory exception permits a Mussalman to create a wakf for the maintenance and support of family, children, or descendants only if the ultimate benefit is reserved for a religious, pious, or charitable purpose of a permanent nature. The deed did not satisfy that requirement because its ultimate charitable destinations were either non-charitable, uncertain, or not of a permanent character, and the settlor had reserved the income for his absolute use rather than for maintenance and support. The document also disclosed no dominant charitable intention capable of bringing the disposition within the protection of the Act.

Conclusion: The wakf-alal-aulad was invalid, and the deed was void and inoperative except to the limited extent otherwise saved.

Issue (ii): whether the provision setting apart a yearly sum for the poor relatives was a valid charitable trust notwithstanding the invalidity of the wakf

Analysis: A gift to charity in praesenti through trustees is not prohibited by Mahomedan law, provided the object is a recognised charitable object. The direction to pay Rs. 200 annually to not more than three poor members of the settlor's family was treated as a genuine charitable object, unlike the provisions for the feast and the payments to Sayyeds and Fakirs, which were not upheld. That limited charitable provision could therefore stand independently of the invalid wakf.

Conclusion: The yearly provision of Rs. 200 for poor relatives was valid and enforceable.

Final Conclusion: The deed failed as a wakf-alal-aulad under the validating statute, but the limited charitable direction in favour of poor relatives survived, and the trustees were directed to give effect to that part while holding the remainder for the heirs.

Ratio Decidendi: A wakf-alal-aulad is protected only where the trust is for family maintenance and support and the ultimate benefit is reserved for a charitable purpose of a permanent character; a distinct immediate charitable trust may still be upheld if its object is a recognised charity.

---