Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        1974 (2) TMI 97 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court ruling: Barooah retains directorship, share allotment illegal. Sections 397 & 398 apply. Appeal dismissed. The court held that Barooah did not vacate his directorship under section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956, as alleged. The allotment of shares to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court ruling: Barooah retains directorship, share allotment illegal. Sections 397 & 398 apply. Appeal dismissed.

                          The court held that Barooah did not vacate his directorship under section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956, as alleged. The allotment of shares to Khaund was deemed mala fide, aimed at gaining control. Sections 397 and 398 were found applicable due to oppressive conduct towards Barooah. However, the order for Barooah to sell his shares was deemed unjust. The appeal was dismissed, declaring the share allotment illegal, appointing a special officer, and setting aside the share sale order.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Whether Barooah vacated his office as director under section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956.
                          2. Whether the allotment of 1,000 shares to Khaund was bona fide and in the interest of the company or mala fide and intended to gain control of the company.
                          3. Applicability of sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                          4. Whether the order directing Barooah to sell his shares to Khaund was justified.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Whether Barooah vacated his office as director under section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956:

                          The court found that Barooah did not vacate his office under section 283(1)(g) as claimed by the appellants. It was established that Barooah had not received notices of the Board meetings held after his re-election on 22 August, 1970, and that he had been granted leave of absence systematically for over a decade, even when he had absented himself for more than three consecutive meetings. The invocation of section 283(1)(g) was found to be mala fide and intended to remove Barooah from the Board.

                          2. Whether the allotment of 1,000 shares to Khaund was bona fide and in the interest of the company or mala fide and intended to gain control of the company:

                          The court held that the allotment of 1,000 shares to Khaund was not made bona fide in the interest of the company. The purported financial crisis cited by the appellants was found to be unsubstantiated. The evidence showed that the company's financial position did not necessitate the urgent raising of funds through the allotment of shares. The allotment was made with the sole intention of reducing Barooah to a minority and gaining control of the company for Khaund and Mitra. The court concluded that this act was mala fide, improper, and invalid.

                          3. Applicability of sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956:

                          The court found that the requirements of both sections 397 and 398 were satisfied. The conduct of the company's affairs was deemed oppressive to Barooah, as the majority shareholder was wrongfully reduced to a minority. The wrongful ouster of Barooah from the Board and the allotment of shares to Khaund justified the making of a winding-up order on the just and equitable ground. However, winding up the company would unfairly prejudice Barooah, thereby fulfilling the requirements of section 397. The court also held that the affairs of the company were being conducted in a manner prejudicial to its interests, satisfying the requirements of section 398.

                          4. Whether the order directing Barooah to sell his shares to Khaund was justified:

                          The court held that the order directing Barooah to sell his shares to Khaund was unjust and improper. It would enable Khaund and Mitra to benefit from their wrongful and mala fide acts and would not redress Barooah's grievances. The court emphasized that generally, a majority shareholder should not be directed to sell his shares to the minority group, as it would deprive him of his valuable rights and would not meet the ends of justice. The court set aside the order directing Barooah to sell his shares to Khaund and his group.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection was allowed. The court upheld the order of the learned trial Judge declaring the issue and allotment of 1,000 shares to Khaund as illegal and void. The court also upheld the appointment of a special officer to manage the company's affairs and directed the special officer to call an extraordinary general meeting for electing a new Board of directors. The order directing Barooah to sell his shares to Khaund was set aside, and no order was made directing any party to sell their shares.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found