Balance sheet acknowledgement and part-payment extend limitation; DRT and SARFAESI proceedings do not bar a complete insolvency petition.

Disclosure of liability in audited balance sheets was treated as acknowledgement of debt, and part-payment was also relied on to extend limitation, so the Section 7 insolvency claim was treated as not time-barred. Pendency of DRT proceedings and SARFAESI action was not considered a bar to admission of a complete insolvency application because the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was applied as overriding inconsistent recovery processes. On the stated facts, debt and default were regarded as established, and admission of the petition was followed by moratorium and CIRP initiation.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation; (ii) Whether pendency of proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and action under the SARFAESI Act barred admission of the petition; (iii) Whether default and debt were established so as to admit the petition and commence the corporate insolvency resolution process.

Issue (i): Whether the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The Corporate Debtor's liability was reflected in its audited balance sheets, and such disclosure was treated as acknowledgement of debt. The admitted part-payment was also relied upon as an acknowledgement extending limitation. On that basis, the claim could not be treated as time-barred.

Conclusion: The petition was not barred by limitation and the objection was rejected.

Issue (ii): Whether pendency of proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and action under the SARFAESI Act barred admission of the petition.

Analysis: The existence of proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and before the Debts Recovery Tribunal was held not to be a ground to reject an otherwise complete application under the insolvency code. The insolvency code was applied as having overriding effect over inconsistent laws.

Conclusion: The pending DRT and SARFAESI proceedings did not prevent admission of the petition.

Issue (iii): Whether default and debt were established so as to admit the petition and commence the corporate insolvency resolution process.

Analysis: The debt and default were found to be admitted, the application was complete, and the requirements for admission under Section 7 were satisfied. Once default was established and no defect remained in the application, admission followed, along with moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional.

Conclusion: The petition was admitted and the corporate insolvency resolution process was initiated.

Final Conclusion: The insolvency application succeeded, the debtor's objections on limitation and parallel recovery proceedings failed, and moratorium with CIRP follow-up directions was ordered.

Ratio Decidendi: Disclosure of a liability in audited balance sheets constitutes acknowledgement of debt for limitation purposes, and pendency of DRT or SARFAESI proceedings does not bar admission of a complete Section 7 insolvency application when default is established.

---