Supreme Court Compounds SEBI Violation, Imposes Penalties

The Supreme Court found the appellants in violation of SEBI regulations, imposing a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000. Despite prosecution proceedings initiated for non-payment, the appellants sought compounding, which was initially denied. However, upon depositing Rs. 1,50,000 and agreeing to pay the remaining amount within two weeks, the court allowed compounding upon depositing an additional penalty of Rs. 2,00,000. The court considered the circumstances and directors' age, deciding to compound the offense without addressing broader legal issues, with the condition that the penalty amount be paid within two weeks to SEBI.

---

---

Issues: Violation of SEBI regulations, compounding of offense, penalty imposition, deposition of penalty amount.

In the present case, the Supreme Court examined the violation of Regulation 7(1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997, along with Section 15(A)(b) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. The appellants were found to be in violation, leading to the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000. Despite this, the penalty amount was not paid, resulting in the initiation of prosecution proceedings under Section 24(2) of the SEBI Act on 14th January, 2013. The appellants subsequently sought compounding before the Special Court, SEBI, which was denied on 27th December, 2017, and their appeal against this decision was dismissed by the Bombay High Court on 30th October, 2018.

Regarding the penalty amount, a notice of demand was served on the appellants, indicating a total amount due of Rs. 4,10,693, including the penalty, interest, and recovery costs. The appellants claimed to have deposited Rs. 1,50,000 on 2nd May, 2019, and assured the court that the remaining interest amount would be paid within two weeks. The respondents agreed to compound the offense if the full amount, including a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000, was deposited within the specified time frame.

Considering the circumstances and the age of the directors involved, the court decided to compound the offense upon the payment of the specified amount by the appellants. It was clarified that this decision did not address any broader legal issues raised by the appellants. The appeal was disposed of with the condition that the penalty amount of Rs. 2,00,000 should be deposited with the Securities and Exchange Board of India within two weeks.

---