Scheme of arrangement sanction upheld where corporate approvals, statutory compliance, and undertakings resolved regulatory objections.

A scheme of arrangement may be sanctioned where the petitioner companies have obtained the required corporate approvals, complied with procedural directions, and shown that the proposal serves a legitimate business purpose and is consistent with the statutory framework. The Tribunal accepted the absence of opposition and held the scheme fair, reasonable, and not opposed to law or public policy. Regulatory objections on accounting treatment, tax compliance, and increase of authorised share capital did not defeat sanction because the companies gave express undertakings to make the necessary accounting entries, comply with income tax law, and increase capital as required under the Companies Act, 2013. The arrangement was approved subject to those undertakings.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Scheme of Arrangement could be sanctioned as fair, reasonable and not opposed to law or public policy; (ii) Whether the Regional Director's objections regarding accounting treatment, tax compliance, and increase of authorised share capital required rejection of the Scheme.

Issue (i): Whether the Scheme of Arrangement could be sanctioned as fair, reasonable and not opposed to law or public policy.

Analysis: The Petitioner Companies had obtained the necessary corporate approvals, complied with the directions for convening and dispensing with meetings, and placed the Scheme before the Tribunal after completion of the prescribed procedural requirements. No objector appeared to oppose the Scheme. On the material placed on record, the Scheme was found to serve a legitimate business purpose and to be consistent with the statutory framework governing company arrangements.

Conclusion: The Scheme was held to be fair, reasonable, and not violative of law or public policy, and was sanctioned.

Issue (ii): Whether the Regional Director's objections regarding accounting treatment, tax compliance, and increase of authorised share capital required rejection of the Scheme.

Analysis: The objections were addressed by the Petitioner Companies through express undertakings to pass the necessary accounting entries in accordance with applicable accounting standards, to comply with the Income Tax law in relation to any tax consequences arising from the Scheme, and to increase authorised share capital in accordance with the Companies Act, 2013 whenever required. The Tribunal accepted these assurances and found the statutory compliances sufficient.

Conclusion: The objections did not warrant refusal of sanction, and the Scheme was approved subject to compliance with the stated undertakings.

Final Conclusion: The company petition for sanction of the Scheme was allowed, and the arrangement was made binding with directions for filing, compliance, and payment of costs.

Ratio Decidendi: A scheme of arrangement may be sanctioned where requisite corporate approvals and statutory compliances are established, no opposition is raised, and regulatory objections are satisfactorily met by enforceable undertakings.

---