Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the 1982 transfer and sale certificate could be sustained in the face of suppression of earlier proceedings and alleged fraud, and whether the High Court was justified in cancelling the later orders and dismissing the connected writ petitions.
Analysis: The record showed that earlier orders, remand proceedings, appeals, revisions, and writ proceedings concerning the same property had been suppressed when the later transfer was sought. The Custodian's power under the evacuee property law was protective in nature and transfer of property required compliance with the statutory procedure, including prior approval where mandated. The later order was passed without notice to affected parties and without following the proper process. The Court held that a transaction brought about by concealment of material facts and abuse of statutory power cannot be protected by equity or by earlier proceedings, and that fraud and suppression strike at the root of the order. The later transfer, being founded on such suppression, was treated as unlawful and ineffective.
Conclusion: The challenge failed. The High Court's view upholding cancellation of the 1982 transfer and rejecting the connected petitions was sustained.