Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a winding up proceeding referred by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and pending before the High Court, on an application moved after 17.08.2018, was required to be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
Analysis: The applicable framework comprised Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rules 5 and 6 of the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016, as interpreted in the controlling Supreme Court decision. Proceedings falling under Section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and pending before the High Court were to continue before that forum until a party sought transfer after the relevant amendment date. Once such an application was made, the High Court had no discretion to retain the matter and had to transfer it to the National Company Law Tribunal, where it would be dealt with as an application for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
Conclusion: The transfer application was maintainable and had to be allowed, and the winding up proceeding was required to be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal for further action under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.