Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the miscellaneous petitions seeking recall of the Tribunal's earlier order under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were maintainable, or whether they amounted to an impermissible review.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the grounds urged in the petitions did not disclose any rectifiable mistake apparent from the record. The relief sought was in substance a request to rewrite the earlier order by reappreciating the matter, which is beyond the limited scope of section 254(2) and amounts to a review.
Conclusion: The miscellaneous petitions were not maintainable and were rejected.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's attempt to secure recall of the earlier order failed, and the Tribunal's prior decision remained undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: The power under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to rectification of apparent mistakes and cannot be used to seek a review or rewrite of an earlier order.