TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Bombay HC grants protection in criminal case, prohibits arrest; stresses FIR disclosure, social media caution</h1> <h3>KANGANA RANAUT & ANR. Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.</h3> KANGANA RANAUT & ANR. Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. - TMI Issues involved:1. Ad-interim protection against coercive action2. Requirement of full text of FIR for effective adjudication3. Restraint from making statements on social mediaAd-interim protection against coercive action:The applicants, under investigation in a criminal case, sought ad-interim protection from coercive action. The Court, after considering arguments from both sides, granted ad-interim relief directing the 1st respondent not to take any coercive action, including arrest, against the applicants until further orders. This decision was made despite the opposition from the counsel for the 2nd respondent, who highlighted the non-compliance of three summons by the applicants.Requirement of full text of FIR for effective adjudication:The counsel for the 2nd respondent raised a crucial point regarding the absence of the full text of the First Information Report (FIR) on record, which could hinder the effective adjudication of the application. The Court acknowledged this concern and deferred the hearing, instructing the applicants to provide the full text of the FIR. The Public Prosecutor assured that the full text of the FIR would be supplied to the applicants' counsel by a specified date, which would then be shared with the Court and the counsel for the 2nd respondent.Restraint from making statements on social media:During the proceedings, the counsel for the 2nd respondent requested the Court to restrain the applicants from making any statements on social media or electronic platforms regarding the subject FIR, considering the sensitivity of the matter. In response, the applicants' counsel assured that no comments would be made on social or electronic media concerning the FIR. The Court accepted this statement, emphasizing the importance of parties acting in accordance with the order and refraining from making any public statements.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues addressed by the Bombay High Court, emphasizing the importance of procedural requirements, protection against coercive actions, and the need for parties to act responsibly in legal matters.
TaxTMI 