TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns CIT order under sec 263 for assessment year 2008-09, remits for fresh consideration</h1> <h3>A.P. Began HUF, Versus The Income Tax Officer, Chennai</h3> A.P. Began HUF, Versus The Income Tax Officer, Chennai - TMI Issues involved: Appeal against order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act for assessment year 2008-09.Summary:The appellant, an HUF, filed its return for the assessment year admitting total income. The Assessing Officer accepted the net capital gains working and completed the assessment. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Income Tax issued a notice u/s 263, stating the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue regarding the claim of exemption u/s 54F. The appellant did not appear for the hearing, and the CIT directed the AO to pass a fresh order. The appellant appealed to the Tribunal, arguing that the order u/s 263 was bad in law as the father of the HUF was not assessed to tax. The Tribunal set aside the CIT's order, remitting the matter back for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for the appellant to provide an explanation. The decision in Addl.CIT v. Durgamma was also to be considered.In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 