Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court orders FIR by CBI in SRC misappropriation case, stresses independent probe</h1> <h3>Satish Pandey Versus Union Of India, Secretary (Personnel) (DOPT), The Secretary, Ministry Of Human Resources And Development (MHRD), State Of Chhattisgarh, Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI), Secretary To Honble Minister, The Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan Avm Vikash Vibhag, The Secretary, Panchayat Avm Gramin Vikash Vibhag, Shri B.L. Agrawal, Shri Sunil Kujur, Kundan Singh Thakur And Others. And B.L. Agrawal Versus Kundan Singh Thakur, Union Of India And Others.</h3> Satish Pandey Versus Union Of India, Secretary (Personnel) (DOPT), The Secretary, Ministry Of Human Resources And Development (MHRD), State Of ... Issues: Misappropriation of funds at the State Disabled Resource Center (SRC) and legality of directing CBI to register an FIR without hearing the prospective accused.Misappropriation of Funds at SRC:The case involved allegations of misappropriation of funds at the State Disabled Resource Center (SRC). The writ petition, later converted into a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), raised concerns about the withdrawal of a significant amount for salary payments by falsely claiming that employees were working at the Physical Referral Rehabilitation Centre (PRRC). It was alleged that the PRRC existed only on paper without any tangible activity, recruitment process, or establishment of a hospital for the disabled.Legal Implications of Directing CBI to Register FIR:The Court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register an FIR within one week, seize relevant records within 15 days, and conduct an independent investigation. The applicants in the review petitions argued that they were not heard before the matter was handed over to the CBI, questioning the exaggeration of the defalcated amount to create a larger scandal. Reference was made to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to argue against investigation without government sanction. However, the Court emphasized that prospective accused have no right to be heard at the FIR registration stage.Court's Analysis and Decision:The Court found prima facie substance in the misappropriation allegations and transferred the case to the CBI due to the failure of state authorities to address the financial irregularities adequately. The Court dismissed the review petitions, stating that there was no error in directing the CBI investigation. It clarified that the rule of audi alteram partem does not apply at the FIR registration stage for prospective accused. The Court highlighted that Section 17A of the PC Act does not protect individuals involved in corrupt practices and upheld its jurisdiction to direct FIR registration in cases of suspected misuse of public funds.Conclusion:The Court's decision to involve the CBI in investigating the misappropriation of funds at the SRC was upheld, emphasizing the need for an independent agency due to the involvement of senior officers and the lack of effective action by state authorities. The review petitions were dismissed, affirming the legality of the Court's order to register an FIR without hearing the prospective accused and rejecting arguments based on Section 17A of the PC Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found