Restoration of Inactive CHA Licence Allowed After Revocation Set Aside

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the restoration of a CHA licence's operation that had been inactive for over four years, despite the revocation being set aside more than two years ago. The Tribunal considered the impact on livelihood and deemed it just to permit the licence to operate until a final decision is reached, emphasizing the principles of justice and equity. The Commissioner was directed to implement the order to secure the ends of justice, highlighting the importance of restoring the licence's operation in cases involving livelihood and fairness.

---

---

Issues:
Revocation of CHA licence, prolonged non-operation of licence causing loss, challenge before High Court, restoration of licence operation, equity in allowing licence to be operative.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, comprising Shri P.S. Pruthi and Ramesh Nair, delivered a judgment in response to a miscellaneous application filed for implementation of a previous order. The appellant's counsel highlighted the irreparable loss and hardship suffered due to the prolonged non-operation of the CHA licence, affecting both the appellant and its employees. On the other hand, the department's representative mentioned the challenge before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court regarding the Tribunal's earlier order. Reference was made to a similar case where the High Court observed that the Tribunal should not intervene when an appeal is pending.

The Tribunal noted that the CHA licence had been inactive for over four years, even though the revocation had been set aside more than two years ago. Considering the impact on livelihood, the Tribunal deemed it just to allow the licence to operate until a final decision is reached. Drawing a parallel with a previous High Court judgment, the Tribunal emphasized that the restoration of licence operation would not harm the Revenue's interests. The Tribunal highlighted the distinction in each case's facts and the absence of a stay order by the High Court, emphasizing the need for equity in allowing the licence to function as per the Tribunal's order.

In line with the principles of justice and equity, the Tribunal directed the Commissioner to implement their order from 18-3-2013 under Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 to ensure the ends of justice are secured. The judgment was pronounced on 27-8-2015, emphasizing the importance of restoring the licence's operation in cases where livelihood and fairness are at stake.

---