Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of the Darbargadh palace was includible in the assessee's net wealth for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1965-66, and whether any life interest in the property was separately assessable.
Analysis: The assessable net wealth under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, extends only to assets belonging to the assessee on the valuation date. The Darbargadh was held under a custom of impartibility and inalienability, and the governing principle was that an impartible estate, though subject to special incidents, does not become the holder's separate or exclusive property merely because partition and alienation are excluded. The Court treated the later insertion of section 4(6) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, as introducing a deeming fiction and not as a declaratory statement of the pre-existing law. That provision could operate only from 1 April 1965. On that basis, no separate life interest question survived for the earlier years.
Conclusion: The value of the Darbargadh was not includible in the assessee's net wealth for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1964-65, but it was includible for the assessment year 1965-66. The question of a separate life interest did not arise.
Ratio Decidendi: An impartible estate is not the holder's exclusive personal property for wealth-tax purposes before the statutory deeming fiction in section 4(6) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and that fiction operates only from its commencement.