NDPS bail principles: secret information alone was insufficient to link the accused to co-accused recovery, supporting release.

In an NDPS bail context, mere secret information connecting an accused to a co-accused's recovery was treated as insufficient where no contraband was recovered from the petitioner and no other evidence showed possession or direct involvement. The material did not prima facie establish the petitioner's link to the alleged offence, and the statutory bail restrictions were considered not to bar release where there were reasonable grounds to believe the accused was not guilty. On that basis, the petitioner was found entitled to bail.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail where no recovery was made from him and the prosecution sought to connect him to the co-accused's recovery only through secret information under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Analysis: The petitioner was not shown to have been in possession of any contraband. The only material relied upon to connect him with the co-accused's recovery was secret information. In the absence of any other evidence, such information was insufficient to prima facie link the petitioner with the alleged offence. On that basis, and applying the approach that the statutory bail restrictions do not bar release where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty, the Court found the prosecution case against the petitioner inadequate at the bail stage.

Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to bail.

---