TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether forfeiture of the security deposit was justified on the allegation that the Customs House Agent had contravened Regulation 13(d) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2014 by failing to advise the importer and by being involved in the importer's undervaluation of goods.
Analysis: The enquiry report had exonerated the appellant on the alleged violations, and the only basis for the adverse finding was the manager's statement acknowledging an oversight in not noticing the invoice discrepancy. The material on record did not establish collusion or abetment in the undervaluation. A customs broker files documents on the basis of papers furnished by the importer and cannot be expected to verify them at the foreign exporter's end. In the absence of proof that the appellant knew or had reason to suspect misdeclaration, the obligation to advise under Regulation 13(d) was not attracted.
Conclusion: The forfeiture of the security deposit was not sustainable and the finding of contravention under Regulation 13(d) was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A customs broker's liability under Regulation 13(d) arises only when there is evidence of knowledge or reason to suspect non-compliance by the importer; mere reliance on importer-supplied documents or a clerical oversight does not establish abetment or justify forfeiture.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
