Court orders provisional acceptance of GST returns pending registration correction

The court directed the respondents to consider provisionally accepting GST returns through manual or portal methods for the petitioner, pending correction of the GST Registration certificate. The case is ongoing, with the respondent undertaking to file a counter affidavit. The court emphasized procedural requirements by ordering the issuance of a certified copy of the order on the same day. This case illustrates the court's willingness to address technical issues and provide interim relief in tax-related disputes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Correction of GST Registration certificate
2. Permission to file returns under Uttarakhand GST Act, 2017 and submit FORM GST TRAN-01
3. Restraining coercive action for not filing returns on time

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing auto parts, filed a writ petition seeking correction of the GST Registration certificate due to technical issues preventing the upload of monthly returns and GST TRAN-1, leading to non-registration. The prayer includes a mandamus to correct the certificate and permit filing of returns as per Uttarakhand GST Act, 2017.

2. The respondent's counsel informed the court that the matter is under consideration with the GST Council and undertook to file a counter affidavit within two weeks. The case was listed for further hearing on a specified date, indicating the ongoing nature of the proceedings and the need for additional information from the respondents.

3. The petitioner requested interim relief citing similar orders from other High Courts in comparable cases. The court directed the respondents to address the possibility of provisionally accepting the GST TRAN-1 and other returns through manual or portal methods to facilitate filing by the petitioner. This demonstrates the court's consideration for interim measures pending a final decision.

4. The court ordered the issuance of a certified copy of the order on the same day, highlighting procedural requirements and ensuring prompt communication of the court's directives to the concerned parties. The case reflects a typical legal process involving technical issues, administrative considerations, and the balancing of interests between the petitioner and the respondents in a tax-related dispute.

---