TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Challenges to Tax Assessment Validity & Income Determination: Tribunal's Emphasis on Due Process</h1> <h3>Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pandey Versus ITO, Range- III (4), Mirzapur</h3> Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pandey Versus ITO, Range- III (4), Mirzapur - TMI Issues involved:1. Assessment validity and additions made without proper consideration.2. Justification of income determination from truck plying business.3. Addition under Section 69 and its justification.4. Addition maintained by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) and its validity.5. Additional grounds for appeal.6. Dismissal of certain grounds not pressed.7. General nature of certain grounds not requiring separate adjudication.8. Challenge to additions made by authorities below.9. Requirement for additional evidence to substantiate contentions.10. Cash deposits in Axis Bank account and justification of sources.11. Remitting matters back to Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.12. Verification of bonafide explanations by the assessee.13. Direction for production of relevant evidences.14. Adjudication on merits in accordance with law.15. Providing adequate opportunity to the assessee in accordance with principles of natural justice.Analysis:1. The appeal challenges the assessment validity and additions made without proper consideration. The appellant contested the assessment framed under Section 143(3) as bad in fact and law, highlighting unjustified income determinations from the truck plying business and additions made under Section 69. The grounds raised were thoroughly examined, leading to the dismissal of certain grounds not pressed and others deemed general in nature.2. The income determination from the truck plying business was a key issue. The Assessing Officer assessed the income under the presumptive regime, invoking Section 44AE of the Income-tax Act. The appellant's explanations regarding investments in the truck were not accepted, leading to additions under Section 69. The appellate tribunal directed the appellant to produce relevant documentary evidence to substantiate their contentions, remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.3. Another contentious issue was the cash deposits in the Axis Bank account. The appellant failed to disclose this account initially, and explanations regarding the sources of cash deposits were deemed insufficient. The tribunal directed the appellant to provide details of income from truck plying and cash book to justify the cash deposits. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for verification of the bonafide explanations and production of all relevant evidences for further adjudication.4. Throughout the judgment, the importance of providing adequate opportunity to the assessee in accordance with principles of natural justice was emphasized. The tribunal allowed certain grounds for statistical purposes, highlighting the need for thorough examination and adjudication on merits in compliance with legal provisions.5. In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, underscoring the significance of due process, substantiated contentions, and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments and appeals.This detailed analysis outlines the key issues raised in the appeal, the tribunal's considerations, and the directions provided for further adjudication, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the judgment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
