Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the upward transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 1,79,11,717 on account of support services received from the associated enterprise was justified.
Analysis: The assessee showed that it had no employees on its payroll and was functionally dependent on the associated enterprise for day-to-day business support, including procurement and sale support, compliance assistance, financial and tax-related support, and other incidental services. The record included agreements, time sheets, debit notes, and documentary evidence showing actual rendering of services and cost allocation with mark-up. The material also supported that the services were not duplicative and that the assessee's business operations and turnover were enabled by such support. In the assessee's own earlier year, on similar facts, the coordinate bench had deleted a comparable adjustment for management support services.
Conclusion: The adjustment was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where intra-group services are evidenced by agreements and contemporaneous documents showing actual receipt and business necessity, a transfer pricing adjustment cannot be sustained merely on a general assertion that the services were not proved or were duplicative.