TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Granted: Deduction under Section 80-IB(10) Upheld</h1> <h3>The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s Vignesh Flat Housing Promoters</h3> The CIT(Appeals) allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the denial of deduction under Section 80-IB(10) due to certain units exceeding 1500 sq.ft. The ... - Issues involved: Appeal against denial of deduction u/s 80-IB(10) based on built-up area exceeding 1500 sq.ft.Issue 1: Denial of deduction u/s 80-IB(10) by Assessing OfficerThe Assessing Officer denied the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80-IB(10) due to certain units in the project 'Vignesh Paradise' having built-up area exceeding 1500 sq.ft. The assessee requested for proportional deduction, but the Assessing Officer refused to grant it.Issue 2: CIT(Appeals) decisionThe CIT(Appeals) allowed the appeal of the assessee, noting that the project had three distinct phases and the violation of built-up area was limited to two individual houses. The CIT(Appeals) held that deduction was available to each unit and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction claimed under Section 80-IB(10) except for the units exceeding 1500 sq.ft.Issue 3: Resolution in favor of assesseeDuring the appeal, it was argued that the issue had been resolved in favor of the assessee based on a decision of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in a specific case. It was acknowledged that the issue of pro rata deduction under Section 80-IB(10) was decided in favor of the assessee.Judgment:Upon reviewing the orders and submissions, it was found that the CIT(Appeals) was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction to the assessee except for the units exceeding 1500 sq.ft. The Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court had previously ruled that proportionate deduction must be allowed in cases where some units exceeded the specified built-up area limit. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and no interference was deemed necessary.This judgment highlights the dispute over the denial of deduction under Section 80-IB(10) due to built-up area exceeding the prescribed limit, the successful appeal by the assessee before the CIT(Appeals), and the final decision in favor of the assessee based on relevant legal precedents.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
