TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules for appellant in exemption limit and service tax dispute, emphasizing independence and burden of proof.</h1> <h3>M/s Anant Industries Iron Re-Rolling Mills Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur</h3> M/s Anant Industries Iron Re-Rolling Mills Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur - TMI Issues:1. Clubbing of clearances for determining exemption limit under Notification No. 8/2003-CE.2. Alleged short payment of service tax on transport of goods by road service under reverse charge mechanism.Analysis:Issue 1: Clubbing of Clearances for Exemption Limit DeterminationThe case involved a small-scale industry registered with the Central Excise Department accused of irregularly availing SSI exemption and not paying central excise duty. The dispute arose from the Department's view that the appellant did not pay duty and service tax due to the alleged clubbing of clearances with another party, M/s Suparash Electro Product Co., which operated from the same premises. The appellant contended independence from M/s Suparash Electro Product Co., highlighting the latter's cessation of operations and the appellant's subsequent takeover. The Tribunal, citing precedents and confirming the independence of the two entities, ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that clearances should be independently considered for exemption determination. The Tribunal's decision aligned with previous judgments and established principles, ultimately setting aside the Commissioner (Appeal's) order on this issue.Issue 2: Short Payment of Service Tax on Transport of GoodsRegarding the alleged short payment of service tax on transport of goods by road service, the appellant had paid service tax on a reverse charge basis. The dispute centered on the condition of Cenvat credit availment under Notification No. 26/2012. The lower authorities upheld the service tax demand due to the appellant's inability to prove the service provider's Cenvat credit status. However, the Tribunal noted the amendment through Notification No. 8/2014, which shifted the burden of proving non-availment of Cenvat credit solely to the service provider. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the service recipient need not establish the service provider's compliance with this condition. As a result, the Tribunal found the service tax liability discharged by the appellant and set aside the impugned order-in-appeal on this issue.In conclusion, the Tribunal found the demands on both counts unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the impugned appeal. The detailed analysis and legal reasoning provided clarity on the issues of clubbing clearances for exemption determination and the alleged short payment of service tax, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.
TaxTMI 