Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 55/2003-Cus. dated 01.04.2003 could be denied by customs after the DGFT had redeemed the EPCG authorisation and certified discharge of the export obligation.
Analysis: The imported capital goods were shown as installed in the appellant's premises, and the export obligation statement filed before the DGFT described the services rendered as cargo handling services. The DGFT issued a redemption letter confirming that the export obligation under the EPCG authorisation had been met in full. In these circumstances, the customs authorities could not reopen the issue of compliance with the EPCG conditions merely by disputing the nature of the service exports. The settled principle applied was that where the licensing authority has accepted fulfilment of the licence conditions and granted redemption, the customs authorities cannot deny the exemption on a contrary allegation of non-fulfilment or misrepresentation.
Conclusion: The denial of the exemption was unsustainable, and the customs demand, confiscation, redemption fine and penalty could not be upheld against the appellant.