Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>ITAT Upholds Exemption for Religious Society Despite Violation</h1> <h3>Assistant Director of Income Tax (E), Trust Circle-II, New Delhi Versus M/s Indian Evangelical Team</h3> The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the order allowing exemption under section 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 for a society engaged in religious ... Exemption u/s 11 - Exemption denied by AO because assessee society is set up for religious activities while claiming charitable status which is clear violation of section 13(1)(b) - HELD THAT:- We find the issue to be covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of ITAT in assessee’s own case for assessment year 2009-10 [2012 (9) TMI 1198 - ITAT DELHI] allowing the claim for exemption u/s 11 - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues involved:Appeal against order allowing exemption u/s 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961 for a society set up for religious activities in violation of section 13(1)(b) of the Act.Analysis:The appeal by the Revenue for the assessment year 2010-11 challenged the order of the learned CIT(A)-XXI, New Delhi dated 27th January, 2014. The only ground raised was regarding the exemption u/s 11 of the I.T. Act, 1961, which was denied by the Assessing Officer due to the society being set up for religious activities, violating section 13(1)(b) of the Act. The ITAT found the issue in favor of the assessee based on a previous decision in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT considered various decisions in earlier years and upheld the exemption claim for the assessee. The ITAT noted that the Revenue had not presented any material to counter the findings of the CIT(A) or provided any contrary decisions to warrant a different view. Thus, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, following the precedent set in the earlier year.In response to the Revenue's argument that the matter should be kept pending due to appeals in earlier years being before the High Court, the ITAT held that the pendency of appeals in the High Court was not a sufficient reason to delay the decision. Relying on the decision in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2009-10, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The ITAT concluded by pronouncing the decision in open court on 29.06.2016, thereby dismissing the appeal of the Revenue for the assessment year 2010-11.