Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether legal expenses incurred by an investment company in proceedings for liquidation of an investee company were allowable as revenue expenditure or were capital expenditure.
Analysis: The expenditure was incurred to prevent further calls on the assessee's share capital and to safeguard its existing investment in a company that was mismanaged and on the verge of liquidation. The steps taken were directed to protecting a capital asset, but the governing principle applied was that expenditure incurred for the preservation of business or the protection of assets forms part of revenue expenditure where it is incurred in the course of business. On that footing, the legal expenses did not bring into existence any new asset or enduring advantage of a capital nature.
Conclusion: The legal expenses were allowable as revenue expenditure and not disallowable as capital expenditure.
Final Conclusion: The question referred was answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee, with costs awarded to the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred for the preservation or protection of an existing business asset is allowable as revenue expenditure, even if it is directed at avoiding a capital loss, so long as it does not create a new asset or enduring capital advantage.