Tax Tribunal: Timing of Income Tax Act Section 56(2)(viib) application clarified

The Tribunal held that Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act was applicable in the year of issue of shares, not on the receipt of share application money. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, upholding the Assessing Officer's addition of excess consideration as income from other sources. The Tribunal directed further adjudication on the determination of Fair Market Value of shares.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Determination of the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The core issue in the appeal was whether the addition of share premium received by the assessee amounting to Rs. 13,90,45,530/- under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was justified. The assessee contended that the share application money had not been received in the relevant previous year, thus Section 56(2)(viib) was not applicable. The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that the issue of shares took place in the financial year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, making the provisions applicable. The AO rejected the assessee's valuation and added the excess consideration as income from other sources.

The CIT(A) held that the section was invoked in the year of receipt of consideration, and since no consideration was received in the impugned year, the addition was not sustainable. The CIT(A) directed the deletion of the addition, emphasizing that the primary requisite for invoking Section 56(2)(viib) is the receipt of consideration against the issuance of shares in the relevant previous year.

The Revenue appealed, arguing that the trigger for the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) is the issue of shares, not the receipt of consideration. The Revenue contended that the Fair Market Value (FMV) is to be determined on the date of issue of shares, and the addition should be made if the premium exceeds the FMV. The Revenue further argued that treating share application money as a deposit until the issue of shares aligns with the Companies Act.

The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue, stating that the trigger for invoking Section 56(2)(viib) is the issue of shares. The Tribunal emphasized that the consideration arises when the contract for the issue of shares is entered into, which is at the point of allotment. The Tribunal held that the section is invoked in the year of issue of shares, not on the receipt of share application money. The Tribunal concluded that the provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) were rightly applied by the AO in the impugned year.

2. Determination of the Fair Market Value (FMV) of shares:
The Tribunal noted that the FMV of shares is determined as per Rule 11U and 11UA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, on the valuation date, which is the date of issue of shares. The Tribunal stated that the FMV should be compared with the actual premium received to determine the excess consideration. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue of determination of FMV of the shares issued, as this aspect was not addressed in the initial order.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) are triggered in the year of issue of shares. The CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate the issue of determination of FMV of the shares. The order of the AO was upheld to the extent of applying Section 56(2)(viib) in the impugned year.

---