Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Karnataka HC to Decide Tower Classification under Cenvat Credit Rules</h1> <h3>Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. Versus Commissioner</h3> The Karnataka HC admitted an appeal to determine the classification of towers and shelters under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant requested a ... CENVAT Credit - inputs - capital goods - “part” or “component” or “accessory” of the capital goods - tower and shelter - entitlement to credit when tower/shelter is “immovable property” - HELD THAT:- Stay of the order passed in Final Order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Karnataka High Court admitted an appeal regarding the classification of towers and shelters as capital goods or inputs under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Court will consider whether the Tribunal's decision on these matters was correct and justified. The appellant seeks a stay on the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.