TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rectifies order on assessment year, rules against re-computation under Rule 8D.</h1> <h3>M/s. Sical Logistics Ltd. Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai</h3> The Tribunal rectified a mistake in an order regarding an assessment year. The Tribunal had directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute expenses ... - Issues involved: Miscellaneous application against the order of ITAT Chennai regarding assessment year 2005-06.Summary:The assessee filed a miscellaneous application against the ITAT Chennai's order for the assessment year 2005-06. The Tribunal had considered the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Godrej Boyce and had directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the quantum of expenses in accordance with Rule 8D. However, since Rule 8D came into effect from 01-04-2007, the assessee argued that the issue should not have been restored to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication. The Tribunal rectified the mistake and expunged the lines restoring the issue to the Assessing Officer. The assessee's application was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 24/06/2011.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
