Money-laundering investigation: custodial remand granted to trace alleged proceeds of crime and test documentary links

Where the materials disclosed a prima facie case of alleged money laundering, including diversion of loan funds, non-implementation of the rehabilitation component, and use of alleged proceeds of crime as untainted assets, custodial interrogation was considered necessary to trace the money trail and confront the accused with documents and other persons involved. On that basis, the Court accepted the request and remanded the accused to the custody of the Enforcement Directorate for further interrogation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the accused should be remanded to the custody of the Enforcement Directorate for further interrogation in connection with the alleged offence of money laundering arising from the scheduled offence.

Analysis: The accused had been searched, their statements had been recorded, and they were already in ED custody before production before the Court. The materials placed before the Court indicated alleged diversion of funds obtained as loan, non-implementation of the rehabilitation component of the project, and use and parking of alleged proceeds of crime as untainted assets. On that basis, the Court found that further interrogation in ED custody was necessary to unearth the trail of monies and to confront the accused with documents and other persons involved in the matter.

Conclusion: The request for custody was accepted, and the accused were remanded to the custody of the Enforcement Directorate for further interrogation.

Final Conclusion: The proceeding resulted in grant of ED custody for investigative interrogation in the money-laundering matter.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the materials disclose a prima facie case of laundering of alleged proceeds of crime and further interrogation is required to trace the money trail, custodial remand may be granted for effective investigation.

---