Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (3) TMI 1325 - AAR - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Ruling: Capital gain from STC shares transfer not taxable in India under Section 9(1)(i) The Authority for Advance Rulings concluded that the capital gain arising from the transfer of Symphony Teleca Corporation (STC) shares is not taxable in ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Ruling: Capital gain from STC shares transfer not taxable in India under Section 9(1)(i)

                            The Authority for Advance Rulings concluded that the capital gain arising from the transfer of Symphony Teleca Corporation (STC) shares is not taxable in India under Section 9(1)(i) as the value of Indian assets is less than 50% of the global assets. Therefore, the buyer is not required to withhold tax under Section 195 on the acquisition of shares of STC from STG.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Applicability of Section 9(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Determination of whether the transfer of shares of Symphony Teleca Corporation (STC) constitutes an indirect transfer of shares under Section 9(1)(i).
                            3. Obligation of the buyer to withhold tax under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Applicability of Section 9(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                            The applicant contended that Section 9(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amended retrospectively by the Finance Act, 2012, and further clarified by Explanation 5, deems a share of a foreign company as an asset situated in India if it derives substantial value from assets located in India. The applicant argued that the retrospective amendment is not applicable as there was no mechanism in the Act or Rules to compute the fair market value of the Indian assets at the time of the transaction, rendering the provisions of Section 9(1)(i) impractical. The applicant cited Supreme Court decisions (CIT v. B. C. Srinivasa Setty, PNB Finance Ltd. v. CIT, and CIT v. H. H. Lokendra Singh) to support the argument that if the computation provision is absent, the case should not fall within the charging section. However, the applicant did not press this argument further after the notification of rules 11UB and 11UC.

                            2. Determination of whether the transfer of shares of STC constitutes an indirect transfer of shares under Section 9(1)(i):
                            The applicant argued that even if Explanation 5 to Section 9(1)(i) is applicable, the value of the Indian assets is only 29.3% to 31% of the total assets, which is less than the 50% threshold required for the transaction to be taxable in India. The applicant relied on the case law (CIT v. Amrutanjan Ltd. and DIT (International Tax) v. Copal Research Ltd.) to assert that "substantial interest" means at least 51% of the voting power. The applicant also referenced the ruling in GEA Refrigeration Technologies GmbH, where the Authority for Advance Rulings held that a share transfer did not give rise to a capital gain taxable in India as the value of Indian assets was less than 50% of the global assets. The Revenue, however, questioned the valuation report's assumptions and requested the liberty to take action if discrepancies were found later.

                            3. Obligation of the buyer to withhold tax under Section 195 of the Income-tax Act:
                            The applicant contended that if the transfer of shares is not taxable in India, the provisions of Section 195 would not apply, and the buyer should not be required to withhold any taxes. The Revenue argued that the Finance Act, 2012, introduced provisions to tax indirect transfers of Indian assets, deeming shares or interests in foreign companies as situated in India if they derive substantial value from Indian assets. The Revenue highlighted that the valuation report did not provide the basis for assumptions, making it inconclusive whether the value of Indian assets was less than 50%.

                            Judgment:
                            The Authority for Advance Rulings concluded that the capital gain arising from the transfer of STC shares is not taxable in India under Section 9(1)(i) as the value of Indian assets is less than 50% of the global assets. The ruling is based on the facts and figures presented, and if subsequent verification reveals that the actual percentage exceeds 50%, the ruling would not apply, and the Revenue would not be bound by it. Consequently, the buyer is not required to withhold tax under Section 195 on the acquisition of shares of STC from STG.

                            Summary of Answers to Questions:
                            1. Not pressed.
                            2. The transfer of shares of STC by STG is not chargeable to tax in India under Section 9(1)(i).
                            3. The buyer is not required to withhold tax under Section 195 on the acquisition of shares of STC from STG.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found