Tribunal remands ALP calculation, upholds TDS disallowance on marketing expenses.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It remanded the determination of the most appropriate method for Arm's Length Price (ALP) calculation back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 194C for TDS on marketing sponsorship expenses, affirming the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. The decision was pronounced on 18th September 2015.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of the most appropriate method for Arm's Length Price (ALP) calculation.
2. Applicability of Section 194C for TDS on marketing sponsorship expenses.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Determination of the Most Appropriate Method for ALP Calculation:

The assessee, engaged in trading medical devices, filed its return declaring a loss. During assessment, the AO referred the matter to the TPO for determining the ALP of international transactions. The assessee used the 'Resale Price Method' (RPM) for ALP determination, comparing itself with four companies. The TPO, however, suggested the 'Transactional Net Margin Method' (TNNM) as the most appropriate method, issuing a show-cause notice to the assessee. The TPO argued that RPM requires closely comparable products and complete financial data, which were not available. Consequently, TNNM was adopted, resulting in an adjustment of Rs. 11,55,73,046.

The assessee contended that RPM was the most appropriate method, citing previous acceptance by the TPO and decisions from the ITAT. The assessee argued that the TPO failed to provide detailed reasoning for rejecting RPM. The Tribunal found that the TPO did not adequately justify the rejection of RPM and remanded the issue back to the TPO for reconsideration. The Tribunal directed the TPO to consider the comparable companies selected by the assessee if RPM is deemed appropriate.

2. Applicability of Section 194C for TDS on Marketing Sponsorship Expenses:

The AO observed that the assessee incurred Rs. 52,10,000 on "marketing sponsorship" without deducting TDS, invoking Section 194C based on CBDT Circular No.715. The assessee argued that sponsorships do not constitute a 'work' under Section 194C, which typically applies to works contracts involving advertising agencies. The Tribunal examined the nature of expenses and the relevant CBDT circular, which clarified that sponsorship agreements for publicity through banners, etc., fall under Section 194C.

The Tribunal upheld the AO's decision, affirming that the provisions of Section 194C were applicable as the sponsorships involved advertising activities. Consequently, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was upheld.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal remanded the issue of the most appropriate method for ALP determination back to the TPO for reconsideration, while upholding the applicability of Section 194C for TDS on marketing sponsorship expenses. The order was pronounced on 18th September 2015.

---