Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2019 (10) TMI 1406 - Tri - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Approval of Company Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 2013 The Company Petition seeking approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 was allowed by the National ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Approval of Company Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act, 2013

                            The Company Petition seeking approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 was allowed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi. The Scheme, aimed at consolidating two companies into one entity for business optimization, was found to be fair, compliant with statutory requirements, and beneficial for stakeholders. The Scheme was sanctioned, declared binding on shareholders, creditors, and employees, with operational procedures outlined for implementation. The legal proceedings concluded with the approval of the Scheme of Arrangement for the amalgamation of the two companies.




                            Issues Involved:
                            Approval of Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for amalgamation of two companies.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Scheme of Amalgamation: The petition was filed for approval of the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme proposed the amalgamation of the Transferor Company with the Transferee Company, "Freecharge Payment Technologies Private Limited."

                            2. Rationale for Amalgamation: The rationale behind the proposed Scheme was to consolidate the business of both companies into one entity, enabling them to optimize synergies, achieve economies of scale, reduce overheads, and utilize resources efficiently. The amalgamation was deemed beneficial for all stakeholders involved.

                            3. Regulatory Compliance: The Regional Director and the Income Tax department did not raise any objections to the merger under consideration. The Regional Director specifically highlighted the need for compliance with certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

                            4. Accounting Treatment and Employee Transition: The Scheme detailed the accounting treatment to be followed by the Transferee Company post-amalgamation and ensured that all employees of the Transferor Company would become employees of the Transferee Company without any adverse changes in their terms and conditions of employment.

                            5. Legal Conformity: The Scheme was found to be fair, reasonable, not contrary to public policy, and compliant with all statutory requirements under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. It was concluded that the Scheme did not violate any provisions of law.

                            6. Sanction of Scheme: Considering all the facts presented, the Company Petition was allowed, and the Scheme of Amalgamation was sanctioned. The Scheme was declared binding on the Shareholders, Creditors, and employees of the companies involved, with the Appointed date of the Scheme set as 7th October, 2017.

                            7. Further Clarifications: The Order clarified that it did not exempt the parties from payment of stamp duty, taxes, or any other charges as per relevant provisions of law. It also allowed the parties to apply for necessary directions regarding the implementation of the Scheme.

                            8. Operational Procedures: The Order directed the filing of a certified copy with the Registrar of Companies, dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up, consolidation of documents with the Transferee Company, and the preparation of the sanction Order as per the prescribed format.

                            9. Conclusion: The Scheme of Amalgamation was ultimately sanctioned, and the Company Petition was disposed of, concluding the legal proceedings related to the approval of the Scheme under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013.

                            This detailed analysis covers the key aspects of the judgment delivered by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, regarding the approval of the Scheme of Arrangement for the amalgamation of two companies.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found