Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance deleted by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) under section 36(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was liable to be restored.
Analysis: The appeal concerned assessment year 2009-10 and arose from an assessment completed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The only issue was whether the assessee was entitled to relief from the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under section 36(1)(ii). The Tribunal noted that the very same issue had already been examined in the Revenue's appeal for the immediately preceding assessment year and that the earlier decision had upheld the view that the disallowance was not lawful. On that basis, the Tribunal followed its earlier decision for the present year as well.
Conclusion: The disallowance was not restored, and the issue was decided against the Revenue.