Supreme Court Extends Limitation Periods for Arbitration & Negotiable Instruments Acts

The Supreme Court extended all periods of limitation under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, from 15.03.2020 until further orders due to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. If the limitation had expired after 15.03.2020, an additional 15 days post lockdown lifting was granted. The Court aimed to ease the difficulties faced by legal practitioners and litigants during the pandemic. The Court disposed of the interlocutory application and issued notices in response to other applications, ensuring all relevant parties were informed and involved in the proceedings.

---

---

Issues: Application for directions regarding arbitration proceedings under section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and initiation of proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Analysis:
The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy, considered an application for directions concerning arbitration proceedings under section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the initiation of proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The applicant sought appropriate directions in light of the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Referring to a previous order dated 23.03.2020 in a related matter, the Court acknowledged the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants due to the pandemic and issued an order to extend all periods of limitation prescribed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The extension was effective from 15.03.2020 until further orders by the Court. Notably, if the limitation had expired after 15.03.2020, the period from that date until the lifting of lockdown in the relevant jurisdiction was to be extended by an additional 15 days post lockdown lifting. This decision aimed to alleviate the challenges faced by legal practitioners and litigants in physically filing proceedings during the pandemic.

In light of the above, the Court disposed of the instant interlocutory application. Additionally, several other applications were mentioned, including those seeking clarification, direction, and intervention. The Court issued notices in response to these applications and waived service on behalf of the respondent, the Union of India, given the appearance of Mr. K. K. Venugopal, the learned Attorney General for India, and Mr. Tushar Mehta, the learned Solicitor General, on its behalf. The Court directed that notices be served to other respondents involved in the matter, thereby ensuring all relevant parties were duly informed and involved in the proceedings.

---