High Court upholds writ petition, benefits subject to appeal outcome. Respondents restrained from collecting tax.

The High Court disposed of the writ petition based on a previous Division Bench judgment and interim orders. The decision was made in line with the judgment and order dated 29.02.2012, with benefits subject to the final outcome of a pending appeal in the Supreme Court. The respondents were restrained from collecting tax on molasses during the appeal, but if unsuccessful, the petitioner would be liable for the tax. The writ petition was resolved in accordance with the previous court decisions and orders.

---

---

Issues:
Controversy settlement based on previous judgment and interim orders.

Analysis:
The High Court heard arguments from both parties' counsels and disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage with their consent. The controversy in question had already been settled by a Division Bench judgment and order dated 29.02.2012 in a related case. The High Court noted that the decision of the Division Bench had not been stayed by the Supreme Court, except for a stay on refund and a provision for interest if the assessee succeeded in the appeal. The writ petition was finally disposed of in line with the Division Bench judgment and the interim order of the Supreme Court. The benefit of the order was made subject to the final outcome of the pending appeal in the Supreme Court. Additionally, during the pendency of the special appeal before the Supreme Court, the respondents were restrained from realizing tax on molasses but were required to keep a record of molasses transactions. If the appeal failed, the petitioner would be liable to pay tax as per the law. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of in accordance with the previous judgment and order of the High Court.

---