TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation in view of the alleged time-barred debt. (ii) Whether the financial creditor had established debt and default so as to warrant admission of the petition and commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Issue (i): Whether the petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation in view of the alleged time-barred debt.
Analysis: The debt was treated as having been acknowledged by the corporate debtor through its correspondence seeking one-time settlement and recording negotiations with the financial creditor. Such acknowledgment was held to fall within section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, thereby extending limitation. The inconsistency regarding the date of default did not affect the limitation analysis on the facts placed before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The petition was held to be within limitation, against the corporate debtor.
Issue (ii): Whether the financial creditor had established debt and default so as to warrant admission of the petition and commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Analysis: The Tribunal found no merit in the defence that the one-time settlement proposal did not amount to acknowledgment. It accepted the financial creditor's case that debt and default existed, and held that the petition satisfied the requirements for admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Upon admission, moratorium and other statutory consequences under the Code were directed to follow.
Conclusion: The petition was admitted and CIRP was directed to be initiated, in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 succeeded, the claim was treated as timely, and insolvency proceedings were commenced against the corporate debtor with moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional.
Ratio Decidendi: A written acknowledgment of liability, including a genuine proposal for one-time settlement, attracts section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and can extend limitation for an insolvency under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
TaxTMI 
