Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection should be granted restraining the respondents from demanding administrative charges, and whether the petitioner should be required to maintain separate accounts while continuing GST deposits.
Analysis: The petitioner relied on the statutory scheme under Section 7A(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964 and the pendency of connected proceedings in which similar interim protection had been granted. The respondents did not dispute that interim protection had been extended in analogous matters. In the circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to protect the petitioner pending further hearing, while preserving accountability by requiring maintenance of separate accounts for the sale, supply and purchase of molasses and directing compliance with GST deposits as demanded under the relevant enactments.
Conclusion: Interim protection was granted restraining demand of administrative charges, subject to continued deposit of GST and maintenance of separate accounts.