Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether writ petitions challenging the assessment and consequential garnishee orders were maintainable when the statutory appeal against the appellate order was not filed within the maximum limitation period and the earlier assessment orders had merged in the appellate order.
Analysis: The statutory appellate remedy against the Joint Commissioner's order was available under Section 58 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and the period for invoking that remedy had expired. The assessment orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner had merged in the appellate order and could not be independently assailed. In the absence of a timely challenge before the prescribed appellate forum, and in view of the limitation rule governing such challenge, the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was not to be invoked to examine the merits of the dispute. No infirmity was shown in the garnishee order issued for recovery of the assessed liability.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were not maintainable and were dismissed.