1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court Partially Allows Appeal on Excluded Income from Investments</h1> The High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the ITAT's order concerning the exclusion of income derived from strategic investments. The ... Remand order - Calculation of average investments (confined to the income generating part thereof) - exclusion of tax exempt income derived from strategic investments - HELD THAT:- The observation of the ITAT on the latter aspect, i.e. exclusion of tax exempt income derived from a strategic investments, is not a correct view in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Maxopp Investment Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2018 (3) TMI 805 - SUPREME COURT] . Accordingly, the observations of the ITAT on this aspect are set aside. Observations with respect to the calculation of disallowance under Section 14A being confined to investments that derived tax exempt income are valid in the light of the Division Bench ruling in ACB India Ltd. v. ACIT [2015 (4) TMI 224 - DELHI HIGH COURT]. ITATβs order, to the extent that it makes observations with respect to exclusion of income derived from strategic investments, is hereby set aside. Appeal partly allowed. Issues:1. Correctness of the remand made by the ITAT on the calculation of average investments and exclusion of tax exempt income derived from strategic investments.Analysis:The High Court addressed the appeal concerning the correctness of the remand made by the ITAT. The ITAT's remand was focused on two aspects: the calculation of average investments and the exclusion of tax exempt income derived from strategic investments. The Revenue challenged the remand, particularly questioning the exclusion of tax exempt income from strategic investments. The High Court noted that the ITAT's decision to exclude tax exempt income from strategic investments was not in line with the Supreme Court's ruling in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. Therefore, the High Court set aside the ITAT's observations on this aspect. However, the ITAT's observations regarding the calculation of disallowance under Section 14A, limited to investments generating tax exempt income, were deemed valid based on the Division Bench ruling in ACB India Ltd. v. ACIT.In conclusion, the High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the ITAT's order concerning the exclusion of income derived from strategic investments. The clarification provided by the High Court emphasized the importance of aligning decisions with relevant legal precedents and rulings.