Tax Authority deems share transfer taxable in India as a tax avoidance scheme

The Authority ruled that the proposed share transfer transaction was taxable in India, considering it a tax avoidance device. They held that transfer pricing provisions would apply, resulting in capital gains tax liability for MTH-Swiss. The applicant was required to deduct tax at source under section 195. The Authority emphasized the lack of economic substance in the transaction, designed to avoid tax in India.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Tax liability of the applicant under the India-Swiss Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
2. Requirement for MTH-Swiss to deduct tax under section 195 of the Income-tax Act.
3. Requirement for the applicant to withhold tax under section 195 of the Income-tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue No. 1: Tax Liability of the Applicant under DTAA

The applicant, a Swiss company, argued that the proposed receipt of equity shares from MTH-Swiss would not be taxable in India under Article 22 of the India-Swiss Tax Treaty. The applicant contended that the income arising from the receipt of shares would be classified as "income from other sources" under section 56(2)(x) of the Income-tax Act, which is taxable only in Switzerland as per the treaty.

The Revenue countered that the transaction was a device to avoid tax and lacked economic substance. They argued that the transfer of shares without consideration was not a genuine gift and should be treated as a taxable event in India. The Revenue also emphasized that the transaction involved the determination of the fair market value of the shares, which could trigger transfer pricing provisions.

The Authority concluded that the transaction was indeed taxable in India. They noted that the transfer pricing provisions would apply, and the arm's length price of the shares would need to be determined, resulting in capital gains tax liability for MTH-Swiss.

Issue No. 2: Requirement for MTH-Swiss to Deduct Tax under Section 195

The applicant argued that since the proposed contribution of shares would not be taxable in India due to Article 22(1) of the treaty, MTH-Swiss was not required to deduct tax under section 195 of the Income-tax Act.

The Revenue maintained that the transaction was taxable in India and that MTH-Swiss should deduct tax at source. They emphasized that the transaction was not a genuine gift and involved the transfer of capital assets, which would attract capital gains tax.

The Authority held that the transaction was subject to capital gains tax in India and that MTH-Swiss was required to deduct tax under section 195.

Issue No. 3: Requirement for the Applicant to Withhold Tax under Section 195

The applicant argued that since the shares were being transferred without consideration, there would be no income arising from the transaction, and thus, no tax liability under section 195.

The Revenue contended that the transaction involved the transfer of capital assets and that the arm's length price of the shares would need to be determined, resulting in capital gains tax liability.

The Authority concluded that the applicant was required to withhold tax under section 195 on the capital gains arising to MTH-Swiss from the transfer of shares.

Decision:

The Authority ruled that the proposed share transfer transaction was taxable in India. They held that the transaction was a tax avoidance device and that the transfer pricing provisions would apply, resulting in capital gains tax liability for MTH-Swiss. The applicant was required to deduct tax at source under section 195. The Authority also noted that the transaction lacked economic substance and was designed to avoid tax in India.

---