TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petitioner Withdraws Special Leave Petition Due to Low Tax Effect</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s State Bank of Bikaner And Jaipur</h3> The SC allowed the petitioner to withdraw their special leave petition and pending applications due to low tax effect, dismissing them as withdrawn and ... Addition u/s 36(1)(va) – PF deposited beyond the time prescribed – Scope of section 43B of the Act – Permission for delayed payment as to Employer’s contribution OR employee’s contribution – where the PF and/or EPF, CPF, GPF etc., if paid after the due date under respective Act but before filing of the return of income u/s 139(1), cannot be disallowed u/s 43B or u/s 36(1)(va) - HELD THAT:- Petitioner, on instructions issued by the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance vide F.No. 390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 22.08.2019, seeks permission to withdraw this special leave petition along with pending applications therein due to low tax effect. Special leave petition and pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn, leaving question(s) of law open. The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw their special leave petition and pending applications due to low tax effect. The petition and applications were dismissed as withdrawn, leaving questions of law open.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
