Tribunal grants partial relief to assessee in tax appeal, disallowances upheld on certain grounds.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming partial disallowances on alleged bogus purchases, commission payments, and interest on interest-free advances to sister concerns. The Tribunal provided relief on certain grounds while finding general grounds for just and equitable relief did not require specific adjudication. The order was pronounced on January 3, 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Confirmation of alleged bogus purchases.
2. Disallowance of commission payments.
3. Disallowance of interest on interest-free advances to sister concerns.
4. General grounds for just and equitable relief.
5. Cancellation of interest charged under section 234B.
6. Right to add, amend, alter, modify, and/or withdraw grounds.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Confirmation of Alleged Bogus Purchases:
The assessee, engaged in the business of oil extraction and refining, had shown purchases from a sister concern totaling Rs. 17,41,834/- without providing purchase bills. The Assessing Officer (AO) found these purchases to be bogus due to the lack of evidence and added the amount to the assessee's total income. The CIT(Appeals) confirmed this addition under sections 68 and 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal, considering the entire facts and circumstances, upheld a disallowance of 20% on the said purchases, thereby partly allowing the first ground of appeal.

2. Disallowance of Commission Payments:
The assessee claimed to have paid commission (dalali) totaling Rs. 15,12,700/- to two individuals through journal entries at the end of the financial year. The AO disallowed 25% of this amount due to lack of detailed basis for the payments. The CIT(Appeals) disallowed the entire amount, noting the payments appeared as an afterthought since TDS was deducted post the financial year. The Tribunal found that the brokers had shown the income in their returns and TDS was deducted, thus restricting the disallowance to 20% of the total expenses, partly allowing the second ground of appeal.

3. Disallowance of Interest on Interest-Free Advances to Sister Concerns:
The AO disallowed Rs. 13,98,527/- as interest on interest-free advances given to sister concerns while the assessee had substantial interest-bearing loans. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the disallowance, stating that the assessee failed to establish a nexus between interest-free funds received and advances made. The Tribunal, considering the assessee's reliance on judicial precedents which state that if interest-free funds exceed interest-free advances, no addition should be made, confirmed 20% of the disallowance, thereby partly allowing the third ground of appeal.

4. General Grounds for Just and Equitable Relief:
The Tribunal found these grounds to be general in nature and did not require specific adjudication.

5. Cancellation of Interest Charged under Section 234B:
This ground was not specifically adjudicated by the Tribunal.

6. Right to Add, Amend, Alter, Modify, and/or Withdraw Grounds:
This ground was also general in nature and did not require specific adjudication.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming partial disallowances while providing relief on certain grounds. The order was pronounced on January 3, 2019.

---