Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Ruling: Consistent Classification Required for Export Products</h1> <h3>In Re: M/s. Oriental Carbon & Chemicals Ltd.</h3> In Re: M/s. Oriental Carbon & Chemicals Ltd. - 2021 (48) G. S. T. L. 404 (A. A. R. - GST - Haryana) Issues Involved:1. Classification of 'Insoluble Sulphur' for export under various ITC HS codes as requested by customers from different countries.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:Factual Background:The applicant, a company registered under the GST regime in Haryana, manufactures 'Insoluble Sulphur' and exports it under ITC HS 2802. The company faces issues with overseas customers who encounter difficulties clearing 'Insoluble Sulphur' under ITC HS 2802 00 10, as their respective customs authorities insist on different classifications.Question for Advance Ruling:The applicant sought clarification on whether it could classify and clear 'Insoluble Sulphur' for export under various ITC HS codes (3812 39 30, 3824 90 90, 2503 00 10, 2503 00 90, and 4005 91 90) as required by customers from Thailand, Mexico, Spain, and Europe.Opportunity of Personal Hearing:The case was initially heard on 23.11.2018 and subsequently on 29.11.2018 and 11.12.2018. The applicant provided detailed flow charts and arguments to support their classification requests. The judgment was reserved and released after thorough examination.Comments of the Concerned Officer:The concerned officer confirmed the factual position and stated that the matter was complex and beyond his jurisdiction, needing a decision from higher authorities.Discussions and Findings of the Authority:1. GST Notifications and Classification Rules:- The CGST and HGST notifications specify GST rates based on classification under various Chapters/Headings/Sub-headings/Tariff items.- The rules of interpretation from the Customs Tariff Act 1975 apply to GST classification.2. Harmonised System (HS) Code:- The HS Code is a universal system developed by the World Customs Organization, used by over 200 countries.- The Indian Trade Classification (ITC) aligns with the HS Code system, adding two additional digits for further classification.3. General Rules for Interpretation:- Six General Rules for Interpretation ensure each product is classified under a single heading/sub-heading.- Rule 1 prioritizes the terms of headings and Section/Chapter Notes.- Rule 2 covers incomplete/unfinished articles and mixtures.- Rule 3 addresses goods classifiable under multiple headings.- Rule 4 deals with new goods not covered by existing headings.- Rule 5 relates to containers and packaging.- Rule 6 requires repeated classification exercises for sub-headings.4. Application of Rules:- The rules ensure that goods are classified uniquely under a single heading/sub-heading, negating the possibility of multiple classifications for export purposes.5. GST Rates:- Different GST rates (5% and 18%) apply to various tariff items, emphasizing the need for proper classification.6. Applicant's Position:- The applicant intends to continue classifying 'Insoluble Sulphur' under ITC HS 2802 for domestic clearance but seeks different classifications for exports based on customer requirements.- The authority found no logical reason to classify the same goods under different headings for export.Ruling:The authority ruled that the applicant cannot classify and clear 'Insoluble Sulphur' for export under the different ITC HS codes (3812 39 30, 3824 90 90, 2503 00 10, 2503 00 90, and 4005 91 90) as requested by customers from Thailand, Mexico, Spain, and Europe. The question was answered in the negative.Conclusion:The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to the established rules of classification under the HS Code system and the GST regime, ensuring consistency and avoiding multiple classifications for the same product based on export destinations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found