Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, before issuing process against accused persons residing outside the Magistrate's territorial jurisdiction, compliance with Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was mandatory and, if not complied with, whether the process was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 obliges the Magistrate to postpone issuance of process and either inquire into the case himself or direct an investigation where the accused resides beyond jurisdiction. The requirement is mandatory, and the absence of such inquiry or investigation vitiates the issuance of process. Since the petitioners were residents of Delhi and the process had been issued without compliance with Section 202, the challenge to the summoning order succeeded.
Conclusion: The process issued against the petitioners was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Magistrate for proceedings after compliance with Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.