Blocked input tax credit and taxable coupon recoveries in employee catering and gift-related business promotion supplies.
Input tax credit was denied on employee canteen services because food and catering services fell within the blocked-credit restrictions, and the statutory proviso was treated as applicable only to the employee-benefit clause, not to food and beverages. Coupon recoveries from employees were treated as part of the consideration for the subsidised catering arrangement and therefore included in the taxable value; the employee exclusion in Schedule III was held inapplicable to that reverse-supply structure. Input tax credit on business promotion items such as sweets, dry fruits and gift articles was also denied because goods distributed as gifts are not eligible inward supplies and are expressly covered by the blocked-credit rule. The advance ruling thus upheld taxability of the coupon recovery and rejected credit on the disputed inputs.
Issues: (i) Whether input tax credit was admissible on canteen services availed for employees; (ii) whether recovery through coupons from employees attracted GST and formed part of the taxable value; (iii) whether input tax credit was admissible on business promotion purchases such as sweets, dry fruits and gift items.
Issue (i): Whether input tax credit was admissible on canteen services availed for employees.
Analysis: Input tax credit is available only for inward supplies used in the course or furtherance of business, subject to the specific restrictions in the blocked credit provisions. Food and catering services fall within the blocked-credit category. The proviso relied upon by the applicant was treated as applicable to the employee-benefit clause and not to the clause governing food and beverages. The fact that canteen facilities were required under the Factories Act did not take the credit outside the statutory bar.
Conclusion: The claim for input tax credit on canteen services was held to be not admissible, against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether recovery through coupons from employees attracted GST and formed part of the taxable value.
Analysis: The amounts recovered were linked to the subsidised supply arrangement and to facilities provided in connection with the catering service. Under the valuation provisions, amounts incurred by the recipient that are connected with the supply are includible in the value of supply, and the coupon recovery was treated as part of the consideration for the catering arrangement. The employee-exclusion in Schedule III was held to apply to services by an employee to the employer, not to the reverse situation asserted by the applicant.
Conclusion: The coupon recovery was held taxable and the coupon value was held to form part of the caterer's taxable value, against the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether input tax credit was admissible on business promotion purchases such as sweets, dry fruits and gift items.
Analysis: Goods distributed as presents or gifts do not qualify as inward supplies used in the course or furtherance of business for credit purposes. The blocked-credit provision expressly denies input tax credit on goods disposed of by way of gift, and the applicant itself described the items as gifts or presents for promotion.
Conclusion: Input tax credit on business promotion purchases was held inadmissible, against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The advance ruling answered all referred questions adversely to the applicant and upheld taxability of the coupon recovery while denying input tax credit on the disputed canteen and promotion-related inputs.
Ratio Decidendi: Input tax credit is unavailable where a supply falls within the express blocked-credit provisions, and amounts recovered as part of a subsidised catering arrangement are includible in the taxable value when they form part of the consideration for the supply.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
