Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether loss suffered in a business carried on outside Hyderabad was liable to be set off against income from the assessee's Hyderabad business in computing the taxable business income.
Analysis: The head of income from business was treated as self-contained, and all businesses of the assessee had to be considered together in computing profits and gains under the relevant charging scheme. Section 24(1) was held to apply only where a loss under one head was sought to be adjusted against income under another head, not where profits and losses were being computed within the same head of business. The exemption relating to income arising in an Indian State did not exclude the corresponding business loss from being taken into account in computing total income. The proviso to Section 24 was also held not to enlarge the scope of the main provision so as to deny the set-off.
Conclusion: The Bombay business loss was allowable as a set-off against the Hyderabad business income, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.